In Conversation with Regi Claire

FORWARD ARTS FOUNDATION: When did you start writing poetry and what drew you into it? Please talk about your development as a writer of poems. Tell us when you first felt you were a poet and how it went from there.

REGI CLAIRE: I started writing and publishing fiction in the mid-nineties and early on was told by poet friends that I approach writing ‘like a poet’. This rather puzzled me, but it’s true: I argue through image, I care about rhythm and sound (I read work-in-progress aloud to myself) and I’m very conscious of patterns and form/structure. Also, I prefer obliqueness and regard the reader as my collaborator.

That said, ‘(Un)certainties’ is my first ‘real’ poem. I wrote it from mid-March to early April 2019, moved by a sudden deep urge. And what a rush I got when I sensed while working on it that something within me had changed. Not so much my sensibilities as a writer perhaps, but my attitude towards my writing. Yes, I realised, I was free to play with sound, rhythm and imagery, was free to reveal meaning through an unorthodox form, free to leave spaces, silences. And yet I wasn’t sure I’d actually written a poem – not until a very good friend, a novelist and poet, kept referring to ‘(Un)certainties’ as ‘your poem’.

Since completing ‘(Un)certainties’, I have written a two-page narrative poem (as well as some short fiction). What a liberation to be able to acknowledge, at long last, my poet’s voice!

I write slowly, painstakingly, and I’m not very disciplined. I write in fits and starts, sometimes with my eyes closed, letting my mind go blank and my fingers find their own way around the keyboard.

FAF: What does being shortlisted for the Forward Prizes mean for you?

RC: It’s an incredible honour and a real affirmation, and it has given me a near-tearful sense of self-belief and the courage to persevere, to take myself seriously as a poet.

My heartfelt thanks to this year’s judges and the Forward Arts Foundation.

FAF: Please tell us about the genesis of your shortlisted poem. Is it part of a collection or sequence? Where can a reader find more by you?

RC: One morning in mid-March 2019 I woke up and just knew I wouldn’t be able to continue being a writer unless I expressed my grief, expressed it in a form that could contain and make some kind of sense, even a warped sense, of the senselessness of my sister’s and her partner’s deaths. Lying there in bed, yet again overwhelmed by all my unanswered and unanswerable questions, I suddenly thought of the only possible format that might help put them in some kind of order while at the same time reflecting my distress: a multiple choice questionnaire. Although a drastic and reductive solution, it would give readers the necessary breathing space and allow them to try and fill in the gaps.

Barely a fortnight earlier I’d been deeply affected by Jo Ann Beard’s extraordinary personal account of a US college massacre, published in the New Yorker in 1996. ‘The Fourth State of Matter’ looks and reads like a short story but is, in fact, non-fiction. I chose it for discussion in my critical reading group, which I’d set up under the auspices of the Royal Literary Fund’s Reading Round scheme.

Beard’s subversion of genre became a catalyst, as if a door had opened inside me, letting the light shine in.

I cried as I wrote ‘(Un)certainties’, cried as I re-wrote and re-wrote, cried as I read aloud. But I couldn’t let my sister go unsung.

‘(Un)certainties’ forms the heart of my work-in-progress, a narrative consisting of poetry, short fiction and non-fiction.

Please feel free to visit my website: www.regiclaire.com for examples of my other writing.

FAF: At this moment, the world has been turned upside down by Covid-19. How do you think these extraordinary times will affect your readers’ response to your work?

RC: I hope that ‘(Un)certainties’ and its portrayal of the bewilderment, powerlessness and grief I felt after my sister’s ordeal will give solace to readers and allow them to mourn their own losses.

FAF: Which poets, that you’ve read in the past year, would you most recommend to others and why?

RC: I have been especially moved and impressed by the work of Alice Oswald, Maggie Millner and W S Merwin. Their poetry achieves that rare thing, transcendence. Here are a few of my jotted-down thoughts, in no particular order: meaning as a shimmer of possibilities, form as meaning, words turned inside out and outside in, shape-shifting, quicksilver flashes of insight, epiphany, revelation, stillness of the moment, metamorphosis, arresting imagery, simplicity, universality, playfulness.

And, of course, I love and admire the poetry of Edwin Morgan and Norman MacCaig, two of Scotland’s Grand Old Men, both of whom I had the great pleasure of meeting in their own homes.

A framed print of Eddie’s concrete poem ‘Shadow’ (from his series Guten Morgan) hangs to the left of my desk, and a sun-bleached postcard of one of his Brecht translations is taped to the wall in front of me, below the skylight: ‘When the times darken / will there be singing even then? / There will be singing even then. / Of how the times darken.’

FAF: What is next for you as a poet?

RC: I will go wherever the mood takes me as I try to listen to my inner voice. I would love to work towards a first collection.

FAF: Can we look forward to a publication in the near future?

RC: I have recently completed my third collection of short fictions, A Bestiary for Our Times, for which I’d like to find a publisher.

FAF: What advice would you give to anyone starting out in poetry today?

RC: Give yourself a chance. Be inventive. Push boundaries but don’t write for effect. Always remain true to yourself. Write what only you can write. Trust yourself! And read – read aloud. Different poets, voices, themes, structures, sound worlds, rhythms, imagery etc. Listen as you read and, if possible, listen to the poets themselves.

We are grateful to all our supporters and partners